The last to do it was Martina Hingis in 1997. I know what to change," Kerber said."I will go out there trying to get my next chance against her and take the revenge," she said.Murray and Soares, who won the first Grand Slam they played together at the Australian Open in January, knocked off defending champions Nicolas Mahut and Pierre-Hugues Herbert to reach the final. So I will be ready for anything.Pliskova's triumph over Serena Williams in a semifinal shocker helped propel Kerber to the number one ranking.The men's doubles final wholesale Grab bars will bring up the curtain on Arthur Ashe stadium, with Britain's Jamie Murray and Brazilian Bruno Soares taking on Spaniards Pablo Carreno Busta and Guillermo Garcia Lopez. "Now especially with the win against Serena.The keys will be a sharp serve and an aggressive attack, unlike in Cincinnati where she was "just pushing the balls"."World number one and defending champion Novak Djokovic and third-seeded Stan Wawrinka will spend Saturday prepping for their championship showdown on Sunday."But at the end I know how I was playing in Cincinnati."I know it will be mentally for me also very tough because she knows that she won against me a few weeks ago.Kerber, who finished 2015 ranked 10th in the world, is into her third Grand Slam final of the season after fashioning an upset win over Williams at the Australian Open in January and falling to the American in the title match at Wimbledon.Kerber holds only a slight edge in their head-to-head record, with four victories in their seven matches.But Kerber is still smarting from Pliskova's upset win over her last month in the final at Cincinnati, a defeat she wants to avenge on one of the game's biggest stages.She may be in unfamiliar ground in the second week of a Grand Slam, but in Kerber she'll face a well-known foe."For sure she has a lot of confidence," Kerber said of the 10th-seeded Czech, who had never made it past the third round of a Grand Slam in 17 previous attempts. "I lost to her, I won."We played a lot of times," said Pliskova, just the fourth player to beat both Serena and Venus Williams in the same Slam. That's a final of a Grand Slam, so anything is possible.Pliskova is still riding the wave of momentum her Cincinnati triumph over Kerber sparked.Pliskova is still riding the wave of momentum her Cincinnati triumph over Kerber sparked..She's just the fifth player to reach her first three Grand Slam finals in one year. New York: Newly minted world number one Angelique Kerber is geared up for battle, not thank-you bouquets, when she takes on Karolina Pliskova in the US Open final on Saturday.

Megosztás a facebookon

”That was quite a statement for the Protestant pastor’s daughter, who grew up behind the Iron Curtain and lived through the fall of the Berlin Wall a quarter-century ago.At a time of growing uncertainty and division in Europe, the pragmatic quantum chemist whom Germans call Mutti, or mummy, preached fiscal rectitude and humanitarian principles, often drawing a mixed response.Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi, more politely, stressed that while he had esteem for Ms Merkel, “Europe has to serve all 28 countries, not just one.Her unusually bold move to throw open Germany’s doors to Syrian refugees has particularly battered her long-stellar poll ratings at home, and left the leader of Europe’s top economy isolated on key issues in the 28-member EU.The country that once sent rail carriage-loads of people into concentration camps was now cheering as trains arrived packed with refugees from war-torn Syria, in moving TV footage seen around the world.The rise of Germany’s influence during Ms Merkel’s decade in power has often unsettled European neighbours..When an unyielding Ms Merkel told debt-hit eurozone members to slash public spending, she was caricatured as an austerity dominatrix in Nazi garb who deployed accountants rather than tanks.Ms Merkel was hailed as “Mama Merkel” by refugees who flocked to take selfies with her. “We can do this,” has been Ms Merkel’s mantra ever since, China bathroom shower shelf manufacturers as she has sought to instill courage in a country scrambling to welcome the one million newcomers who arrived this year.“I’ve never experienced such a rapid sequence of highly significant events.”Ms Merkel won over some of her harshest critics with her decision in September to open the doors to a record wave of refugees who were heading in, many on foot, from Budapest.Whether spearheading EU diplomacy with Moscow, bargaining with Athens over tough bail-out terms or responding to the world’s biggest refugee wave since World War II — Ms Merkel was in the middle, again and again.“2015 has been an incredible year, hard to comprehend really,” said the 61-year-old chancellor, who is not usually given to hyperbole, at a congress of her centre-right party this month.In a year of crises for Europe, from the Ukraine war to Greece’s debt turmoil to the historic refugee influx, Germany’s Angela Merkel emerged as the continent’s de facto leader, drawing more praise and fire than ever.

Megosztás a facebookon

Oakland: A California jury on Wednesday awarded USD 29 million to a woman who said that asbestos in Johnson & Johnson’s talcum-powder-based products caused her cancer. The company did not provide further details of the alleged errors during the trial. J&J won three other cases and another five ended in hung juries.The lawsuit was brought by Terry Leavitt, who said she used Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower - another powder containing talc sold by J&J in the past - in the 1960s and 1970s and was diagnosed with mesothelioma in 2017.”Leavitt’s was the first talc case to go to trial since Reuters on Dec.J&J has appealed all of the plaintiff verdicts, and the company said it is confident the verdicts would be overturned on appeal.The jury deliberated for two days before delivering its verdict, which was broadcast online by Courtroom View Network. 7 and included testimony from nearly a dozen experts on both sides.Leavitt’s trial originally included J&J’s talc supplier, Imerys Talc America, a unit of Imerys SE, as a co-defendant.69 billion in a July 2018 multi-plaintiff ovarian cancer verdict.While earlier talc lawsuits alleged talc itself causes ovarian cancer, plaintiffs’ lawyers have more recently focused on arguing asbestos contamination in talc caused ovarian cancer and mesothelioma, a form of cancer linked to asbestos exposure.

California Superior Court Judge Brad Seligman, who oversaw the trial, told jurors in February that the company was no longer part of the case after it filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection under the weight of the talc litigation, which stayed lawsuits against it. The nine-week trial began on Jan. It was the first of more than a dozen J&J talc cases scheduled for trial in 2019.In 11 cases so far alleging asbestos contamination in talc, three have resulted in wins for plaintiffs, awarding damages as high as USD 4. “The internal J&J documents that the jury saw, once more laid bare the shocking truth of decades of cover-up, deception and concealment by J&J.Jurors found that J&J’s talc-based products used by Leavitt were defective and that the company had failed to warn consumers of the health risks, awarding $29. The jury declined to award punitive damages.J&J said it would appeal, citing “serious procedural and evidentiary errors” in the course of the trial, saying lawyers for the woman had fundamentally failed to show its baby powder contains asbestos..

14 published a report detailing that J&J knew that the talc in its raw and finished powders sometimes tested positive for small amounts of asbestos from the 1970s into the early 2000s - test results it did not disclose to regulators or consumers.The New Brunswick, New Jersey-based company denied that its talc causes cancer, saying numerous studies and tests by regulators worldwide have shown that its talc is safe and asbestos-free.The verdict, in California Superior Court in Oakland, marks the latest defeat for the healthcare conglomerate facing more than 13,000 talc-related lawsuits in America.4 million in damages to Leavitt and her husband.“Yet another jury has rejected J&J’s misleading claims that its talc was China Towel racks factory free of asbestos,” said Moshe Maimon, a lawyer for Leavitt, in a statement on Wednesday.“We respect the legal process and reiterate that jury verdicts are not medical, scientific or regulatory conclusions about a product,” J&J said in a statement on Wednesday.

Megosztás a facebookon